In this two-parter, Michigan’s Chris Savage discusses how his Eclectablog has evolved from a personal journal into a widely respected progressive blog that has often been featured on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show. A supporter of the Occupy movement, Savage explains why he thinks the mainstream media are making a mistake by ignoring the importance of providing analysis and context in their reporting. In these videos, Savage also explores various economic models that offer the promise of sustaining bloggers who want to report news that matters from a progressive point of view.
Journalism classes often cast reporters as the last line of defense for our democracy. These noble creatures work for a pittance for news organizations whose sole mission is to ferret out corruption and to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.
Then there’s the reality of what passes for news today. Lots and lots of speculation about Kate Middleton’s wedding dress in the national press. Local news, as always, relies on the sports section and the business section to attract eyeballs. And now we have news organizations pouring what’s left of their dwindling fortunes into hyperlocal online news, which is all too often little more than a glorified version of yesterday’s society pages.
A brief look at hyperlocal publications for cities close to where I live shows no evidence of investigative journalism, enterprise packages or hard-hitting exposes of corruption.
The home page of today’s Rapidian, an online offering in nearby Grand Rapids, features news of an upcoming scholarship fundraiser, a preview of the new Children’s Hospital and an editorial from a member of the Mental Health Foundation of West Michigan on the importance of acknowledging the reality of mental illness in our midst. Informative and well meaning. But hardly the work of courageous muckrakers intent on saving our society.
Maybe there’s just not much going on in Grand Rapids?
A visit to AnnArbor.com reminds us that Michigan plays Ohio State today. The headlines below this earth-shattering news includes:
Chelsea police cracking down on drivers in school zones; new light improves crosswalk visibility
Charges dropped against two men accused of robbing Eastern Michigan University students
Satchel’s BBQ to open on Washtenaw in Ann Arbor in early 2011
New elementary humanities program presents opportunities for Ann Arbor teachers and students
‘New’ Shakespeare to celebrity bios: Blackbird Theatre hosting Raw Weekend II
Stunning revelations all.
Surely Lansing Capital Gains pulls the cover off the seething underbelly of political deal-making in our state’s capital city of Lansing? First, there’s a feature of Heidi Gustad, a wonderfully unique woman who works for the Capitol Area District Library, followed by a feature on the Silver Bells celebration, a speakers’ series on buying local and “Taking a Break for Turkey.”
How have I lived so long without these revelations?
The bottom line for me is that hyperlocal journalism all too often makes shopping guides look serious. The goal is not first and foremost to inform readers but to please advertisers. Isn’t there something wrong when the Benneton ad campaigns of yesterday were far more provocative than any hyperlocal journalism of today?
Some hyperlocal sites strive to do more. The Gotham Gazette, winner of the 2009 Online News Association’s award for excellence in online reporting from a microsite, offers a blog feature called The Wonkster that “continues the discussion about New York City issues, with an array of opinions, breaking news, the offbeat — and more.”
But most hyperlocal news is little more than an endless string of Chamber of Commerce puff pieces interspersed with occasional crime news from the police blotter. No digging, no analysis, no controversy – all the better to please advertisers by avoiding anything that might mildly annoy even one visitor with troublesome news.
Since being walloped by the Internet, news corporations have focused their attention on “developing new online business models,” rather than on how to harness the power of journalism for the public good while making enough money to support such efforts.
Unfortunately as well, many used the combination of the recession and the onslaught of the Internet as an excuse to jettison older (by which we mean more expensive) reporters who knew the community in favor of hiring youngsters willing to run around town with a camera and a laptop for a pittance in the hope they will someday make enough to afford a family and pay off all those student loans.
The truth, of course, is that if you are going to limit your stories to breaking news that consists of three paragraphs and a picture about topics that will be utterly meaningless a day later, you don’t really need anyone who knows the community or remembers the past. But fair warning to young journalists: if all the new news offers is tidbits of local boosterism among the ads, there will never be more than a handful of meaningful jobs that pay well enough to justify paying for a master’s degree.
What I find infuriating is that news corporations remain unwilling to invest in innovation and experimentation. The online environment has the potential to tell important stories in engaging new ways – slideshows, podcasts, video, reader reaction. Yet these insipid new hyperlocal efforts often fill enough of a niche for news that they effectively squeeze out upstart competitors. Without more support for creativity, online journalism risks devolving into nothing more than public relations with a thin patina of news values layered on top.
The goal should not be just to make money, but to make money while providing people news they need, reported in ways that makes these stories compelling.
As the new school year dawns, and I ponder how to update my curriculum for the introductory class on mass media that I teach at Michigan State, I have been struck by the idea that we need to have a frank discussion about rewiring young people’s brains.
What? Come again? Rewire young people’s brains? Yes, that sounds like some kind of scary 1984/Brave New World experiment to be resisted. But the reality is that digital technology is already rewiring everyone’s brains.
The issue is whether we are both smart enough and wise enough to learn how to help students rewire their brains in ways that maximize their intellectual potential — and, one would hope, their emotional, moral and spiritual capacities as well. (And maybe reduce their blood pressure a bit at the same time?)
Technology writer Nicholas Carr writes in “Wired” that surfing the Internet for as little as five hours is all it takes to begin rewiring our pre-frontal lobes in ways that tend to reduce our attention span. Expanding on that theme in his new book “The Shallows,” Carr stresses that he is not a Luddite who proposes that we reject technological innovation. He says that we need to figure out how to cope with the unanticipated downside of our new digital miracles.
Carr cites scientific management, named Taylorism after its inventor Frederick Taylor, as an innovation that brought its own problems locked inside. Taylorism standardized tasks and thereby standardized output. And I, for one, think it’s great that all the bolts in our airplanes were built to strict standardized specs. But the downside of routinizing manufacturing systems was that the rigidity stifled innovation and creativity, while driving workers berserkers.
While the Internet has proven itself a blessing, it has not been an unmitigated one. The Internet is the embodiment of distraction. Wow, this is interesting, but whoops, let me click on this link because it looks intriguing. And then this one and that one and this.
Multi-tasking has also become a new way of life. But as we can see from the traffic accidents that result from people who try to text and drive, such distractions risk preventing us from doing any task well.
At the individual level, that’s a car crash. As the societal level, it could be a train wreck.
If computers and cellphones are changing our brains in ways that make it harder for us to focus and think deeply, we need to figure out a wise response, for us as individuals and for our culture. The challenge lies in devising ways to enjoy the benefits of innovation while minimizing the damage from often-unintended consequences.
Which leads me to Internet guru Clay Shirky’s comments about education today on CNN’s GPS (Global Public Square), the thought-provoking show hosted by Fareed Zakaria. Shirky, whose throwaway insights are often more brilliant than the labored observations others require a lifetime to develop, noted that ever since the 19th century, modern societies have chosen to spend enormous amounts of their treasure and time on teaching five- and six-year-olds how to read.
That’s a massive leap of faith for a culture to make. Doing so must have been a hard sell at first, particularly when times were tough. But somehow people instinctively knew that helping young people learn how to read would make them better people, people who would in turn create a better society.
So it seems that the times require a new leap of faith in teaching children how to quiet their minds as much as stimulate and stretch them.
I think back to the much-dreaded mandatory “nap time” I hated in kindergarten. None of us actually fell asleep. Was that actually intended to help us learn how to still our minds between bouts of childish exhilaration and intense concentration? (Or was it just a way to give harried teachers a break?)
But maybe we could start by finding ways to make tapping into our brain’s ability for reflection appealing. First we need to develop strategies that help young people to learn how to tap into islands of mental tranquility within a world of unrelenting distraction. We also need to help them build the habit of doing so, by making it fun.
In his book, Carr cites research that suggests a powerful antidote to the downsides of distraction may lie in experiencing nature firsthand:
A series of psychological studies over the past twenty years has revealed that after spending time in a quiet rural setting, close to nature, people exhibit greater attentiveness, stronger memory, and generally improved cognition. Their brains become both calmer and sharper.
Richard Louv coined the term Nature Deficit Disorder to describe the way modern life has alienated children from the natural world. Urbanization and parental fears have conspired to rob children of the opportunity to experience the special joy of roaming the woods alone.
As a result, children do not learn to appreciate the value of nature and the importance of protecting the environment. Moreover Carr reports that experiencing nature firsthand also enhances our ability to demonstrate empathy and compassion.
Does this mean I should haul all 240 of my students to Baker Woodlot and hold classes there? Sound appealing, but I am not sure the provost would agree.
Carr cites research that showed people who viewed pictures of rural settings exhibited greater calm that those who were shown city scenes. So I may experiment with showing a slideshow of images of the wild, while requesting that students turn off Facebook and cellphones for a moment.
But I would also argue that rewiring youngsters brains so they learn to love nature and can think clearly about the duty that implies must come much earlier in their upbrining. By the time I get them, as freshmen in college, their hormones have kicked in, which may be even more distracting than the Internet.
Yes, I know school budgets are shrinking. But parents with elementary-school-age children could volunteer to organize nature walks. Middle schools could invest in putting in a school garden or a hoophouse or greenhouse so that youngsters can learn the joys of digging in the dirt and having a tomato to eat to show for their efforts. Architects could be encouraged to create schools that look less like prisons and more like conservatories.
The challenge lies in experimenting with ways to help young people develop a full range of mental gears and the ability to shift through them smoothly.
And we may well fail, at least at first. I think many of us are still struggling with how to teach critical thinking. Finding ways to help youngsters train their brains requires not only a new curriculum but a truly new mindset.
However, I feel a special urgency. We need to create new generations of people who can handle the pace of change our world now demands, especially as the consequences of climate change and financial instability require to adapt quickly and well. I want succeeding generations to use technology well without burning out or tuning out.
Though some will argue that this is mind control that poses a threat to traditional values, the fact is that making the leap of faith to teaching young kids how to read helped shape a better world. Making the investment and commitment in teaching youngsters how to calm their minds by learning to love nature may be our best of hope of saving the planet, including saving it from us.
——–
Other resources:
The Media History Wiki offers those who care a chance to post and edit information about media history. That also means posting about people, events and issues happening today, because they become history tomorrow. So I want to use this opportunity to invite everyone to contribute – students, teachers, historians, people in media industries and people who care.
The initial inspiration for the wiki came in part because of a desire to engage my students in exploring media history. I teach JRN 108: The World of Media at Michigan State University’s School of Journalism, and the class often attracts almost 250 students. Encouraging participation and involvement in large classes is a constant challenge. Using iclickers for instant feedback helps, as does hosting extra-credit liveblogging events and posting weekly media forum discussion topics.
But history is a tough sell. I had been dividing the class into 25 10-person teams, with each team responsible for presenting on a special topic. Most did PowerPoints. Some did mini-movies. We even had a few dances and poems. But the presentations are hard to work into the time available, quality varied dramatically and there was no repository to maintain the great stuff.
A wiki holds the promise of solving all three issues.
I also recognize how much of current history is evaporating. I built my first website in August 1996, so I was around for the Internet boom and bust. So much of that history is already slipping away. How can my students become well-rounded citizens if never have the chance to appreciate:
Virtual Promote: Jim Wilson’s World There was a time when everyone in the online community knew Jim Wilson. He was a kind and generous man who ran a website called Virtual Promote, which offered tips on getting your site noticed. He was doing SEO (search engine optimization) and social media before those terms were invented. And he did it all for free, in keeping with the virtuous circle ethos of the web. Those of us who received his email newsletter and who counted on him for assistance and advice miss him greatly.
I am saddened to see that his memorial site has disappeared. I hope the media history wiki can help us remember those who deserve to be remembered.
Check out the toolbar at the bottom of Lansing Online News. It’s a beta of the new free tool called Wibiya (thanks, Chris) that visitors and web producers alike should love.
As the co-publisher of Lansing Online News, I want to drive traffic to the site, and the toolbar can be configured to make it easy for visitors to share links of stories they like through a variety of different ways. You can also see real-time stats (how else would I have known someone from Africa was visiting the site the same time that I was). The toolbar also gives visitors immediate access to popular social networking sites, so they can use your site as a way to access those pages. They can even tweet directly from the site.
Easy installation. No coding required. Lots of customization options. Who could ask for more? (And if I installed one here, would you use it?)